| | | | | | | | TOWN OF PALM BEACH
Town Council Meeting Development Review on: February 10, 2021
|
| | | | | | | | Section of Agenda
Development Review - New Business
|
| | | | | | | | Agenda Title
Z-20-00321 VARIANCE(S) Zoning District: R-C Medium Density Residential The application of BROOKER DAVID E & CATHERINE E, Applicants, relative to property located at 127 ROOT TRL, legal description on file, is described below. The applicant is undertaking a major renovation project on Root Trail that includes a proposed 2,351.05 two story addition with basement, car lift and loggia. The following variances are being requested in order to build the additions: 1) Section 134-948(5): a front yard setback of 1.1 feet in lieu of the 25 foot minimum required in the R-C Zoning District; 2) Section 134-948(6): a west side yard setback of 4.5 feet in lieu of the 10 foot minimum required in the R-C Zoning District; 3) Section 134-948(6): an east side yard setback of 1.1 feet in lieu of the 10 foot minimum required in the R-C Zoning District; 4) Section 134-948(7): a rear yard setback of 3 feet in lieu of the 15 foot minimum required in the R-C Zoning District; 5) Section 134-948(9): a lot coverage of 49.24% in lieu of the 30% maximum allowed in the R-C Zoning District; 6) Section 134-948(11): a landscaped open space of 40.79% in lieu of the 45% minimum required in the R-C Zoning District; 7) Section 134-1728: allow two air conditioning units with a west side yard setback of 1.75 feet in lieu of the 5 foot minimum required; 8) Section 134-1668: to allow a sliding driveway gate with a 0.67 foot setback from the edge of pavement in lieu of the 18 foot minimum required. 9) Section 134-1757: to allow a 3.5 foot rear yard setback for the proposed swimming pool in lieu of the 10 foot minimum required; 10) Section 134-1757: to allow a 4 foot east side yard setback for the proposed swimming pool in lieu of the 10 foot minimum required [Applicant's Representative: Maura Ziska Esq] [Landmarks Preservation Commission Recommendation: Implementation of the proposed variances will not cause architectural impact to the subject landmarked property. Carried 7-0.] [The Landmarks Preservation Commission approved the project as presented. Carried 7-0.]
|
|